Published/updated: January 2016
By Tony Lock
IBM’s announcement of a storage suite with per Tb pricing is a natural move following the launch of the Spectrum brand last year to sit over its storage portfolio. Back then it looked more like a marketing umbrella for a collection of disparate solutions. Progressive levels of integration have since been added, and offering the ’Spectrum Suite’ as a collectively-priced bundle adds more substance to the proposition. However, buying into IBM’s all-encompassing suite is far from a no-brainer.
First off, per Tb pricing is nothing new in the storage industry; you can get this elsewhere, and experiences of it have been mixed - sometimes it works to your advantage, sometimes it doesn’t - it depends where you’re coming from and where you are headed. Also the ’suite’ model only makes commercial sense if you want enough of the functionality to justify the price. IBM claims it will be worthwhile if clients are interested in two or three of the components, but we’ll have to wait until pricing is announced next month before we can make a judgment on that. Even then, if other vendors’ solutions are place, the switch could be difficult to justify in monetary terms. The transition could be eased by injecting some IBM Financial Services money into a deal to fund a progressive migration, but not all customers will be up for this.
My main concerns, however, are not to do with product capabilities and financial ROI calculations. Decisions are often going to be based on political, integration and support considerations, not to mention an assessment of supplier-related risk. On this last point, the big question for many will be whether or not they want to bet the farm on an IBM suite of products. Big Blue’s staying power in the face of difficult market conditions has been shown to be pretty weak in other areas. With the continued volatility of the storage market (and IBM’s up and down performance within it), an obvious question is whether the company will be tempted to sell out at some point as it did with the x86 server business. Against this background, the Spectrum Suite could make good sense for those who already have a lot of IBM storage management software in place, but others will think carefully before making a decision that will have long-term consequences.
STORAGE under PRESSURE
The use of modern technologies to alleviate the strain
Hyper-Scale Data Management
An open source-based approach to Software Defined Storage
Is cloud the answer to all your storage problems?
Survey respondents generally think not
By Tony Lock
A recent global survey of 1279 IT and business professionals highlighted that rapidly changing business and regulatory demands are driving a need to modify how security is managed in their software development processes. ...more
By Dale Vile
In the drive towards ever faster and more granular software delivery cycles, it’s important to ensure that speed and responsiveness don’t come at the expense of quality. Insights from 327 IT professionals in a recent survey shed light on the issues and practicalities. ...more
By Richard Edwards
By Dale Vile
By Bryan Betts and Dale Vile
Yesterdays software delivery processes are not up to dealing with today’s demands, but modernising you approach is not just about implementing Agile, even creating a DevOps culture. You need to focus on some specific, hard-core principles. ...more
By Dale Vile & Jack Vile
Cloud services are increasingly becoming part of the IT delivery mix, but a recent study of 378 senior IT professionals suggests a parallel commitment to ongoing investment in the datacentre. This in turn shines a light on the key role of modern application platforms. ...more