First published: May 2012
What options are there to help people work together more effectively?
The emergence of new technologies is leading to new possibilities in the way companies operate and people work. Businesses are able to become much more distributed, with employees working to a greater degree from home or in local offices rather than commuting to more centralised headquarters. Employees are becoming much more mobile, with a range of different computing devices. On the back of this, collaboration technologies such as audio, video and web conferencing have started to play a pivotal role – but we’re not yet seeing many companies implementing these.
For the vast majority of businesses, the creation, storage and exchange of information and documents is the glue that binds them together. Central to this success has been the ever increasing use of email and document sharing, together with the use of associated office productivity applications, such as word processing, spreadsheets and presentations. These have reached such a level of ubiquity that their impact and reach can often be overlooked and even taken for granted.
As business operations and working practices have changed, many companies have continued to rely on email and document sharing to form the bedrock of their communications and collaboration infrastructure. The end result is that even as companies have become more fluid and distributed, the inflexible nature of their collaboration environment is holding them back. Conferencing and collaboration facilities – particularly web conferencing and to a lesser degree video conferencing - are generally seen as an effective way to help improve the situation.
The difficulty is that not many companies have deployed these solutions officially. Indeed, a number of companies have taken active steps to block this, but in many cases this leads to ‘underground’ solutions being adopted.
Where companies have not been proactive in implementing collaboration solutions it has often led individual departments or employees to use third-party services in a piecemeal or ad-hoc manner. While this may solve a short term need, the end result is often that different departments end up doing the same thing in completely different ways, resulting in the inevitable management, integration or compatibility issues.
Alternatively, the different departments may have lucked into using the same solution, but with the overhead of having separate, parallel accounts with different configurations and management. Letting the situation spiral out of control is therefore something most IT managers are keen to avoid. The question is how to approach doing this? There are a number of different approaches, and their suitability will be determined to a large degree by how you run your email and document sharing.
Where email and document sharing are run internally, it can be very difficult to consider migrating these to an external provider, therefore any collaboration solutions will need to integrate with what you are already running. The first option, therefore, is to consider providing the collaboration facilities yourself. However, implementing audio, video or web conferencing internally can be difficult.
Often they require significant upfront investment in servers, networking and applications. Then there is the not-so-small matter of professional services to get them up and running and working nicely with the existing systems such as Exchange or SharePoint.
All this requires significant planning and a strong business case with executive sponsorship. Adding to the difficulty is that the level of investment required often leads to opting for a ‘deep and wide’ approach to justify the costs involved and to gain sufficient functionality over existing services to justify the effort.
A second option is to use third-party services that provide conferencing services, and tie these in to the existing email and office tools. The third party would be responsible for the upfront investment in the platforms, reducing the commitment required to get a solution up and running – however, there would still be a lot of work required to get it running seamlessly with what the workforce are already using.
This brings up a third approach, but this is only suitable if you are able to run your email and document sharing with an external third party. This approach uses one of the growing number of ‘full service’ solutions that have recently come to market. What these services do is provide a pre-integrated set of applications and services that are developed and tested to work together and that provide the full spectrum of email and document sharing, together with conferencing facilities of all types.
These may be either hosted services from smaller providers, through to the latest Software as a Service (SaaS) offerings from the likes of Microsoft with Office 365 or IBM with Lotus Live. They may offer services from a single vendor, or have done the integration work to offer a stack of services based on products from multiple vendors.
With these types of services, having access to the advanced conferencing services is getting close to just ‘turning on’ the desired additional services just by adding additional items to the subscription. In many cases, it is possible to also have limited pilots or to offer the service to only a subset of employees without having to incur large setup fees, making it even more convenient to try out new services before committing to them.
The difficulty many companies face is making the decision to switch how they source email and office productivity services, with the majority of companies typically running email and document sharing on-premises. This makes it hard to consider alternative ways to providing them as even performing a major upgrade is often not a prompt to re-evaluate how to source these.
The upshot of all this is therefore to keep in mind the changes that are happening in working practices and business processes, and to look at how new hosted or cloud options may give additional flexibility and value provided you are prepared to give them consideration.
CLICK HERE TO VIEW ORIGINAL PUBLISHED ON
By Dale Vile
By Tony Lock
Windows Server 2012 is a big bet for Microsoft, and is a major step forward as releases go. It brings together wide-ranging new capability and functional improvements. But how ready is it for mainstream deployment? ...more
By Dale Vile
Empowering employees through the delegation of authority and trust can enhance innovation and productivity. But beyond the hot topic of BYOD, what are the real key enablers of employee empowerment from an IT and communications perspective? ...more
By Dale Vile
The death of on-premise IT as a result of hosted cloud services is greatly exaggerated. The enterprise data centre will therefore remain the pivot point for IT delivery for the foreseeable future. But how will it develop to keep up with rapidly changing demands? ...more
By Tony Lock
Results of a web survey illustrate the state of business information and analytics today. Just how familiar are organisations with concepts like ‘Big Data’ and are IT professionals ready to believe such solutions are ready for mainstream adoption. ...more
By Dale Vile
The way in which organisations communicate and transact across supply and demand chains has a big impact on business performance, but what are the keys to success when it comes to B2B integration? ...more
By Dale Vile
To make sense of private cloud, you need unravel it from the broader cloud computing discussion. Those that have done this say that private and public cloud have little to do with each other. But they do see private cloud strategic enabler of the next generation data centre. ...more