Published/updated: November 2010
By Josie Sephton, Dale Vile & Tony Lock
The desktop environment is ready for change
Desktop modernisation plans have been on hold for many organisations as a result of reluctance to press ahead with Vista, and challenging economic conditions. Organisations that have historically embarked on significant periodic refreshes have been less active. Only 18% have implemented a major upgrade recently, for example; much lower than the 25-33% we would expect based on a typical 3 to 4 year cycle. Clearly many organisations have some catching up to.
Investment in the desktop is bouncing back
With finances starting to free up and Windows 7 neutralising the previous Vista road block, the evidence of catch up plans and activity is already evident. Almost two thirds of those who have historically embarked on periodic refreshes are either in the process of a hardware upgrade or are planning one within the coming year. Operating system upgrades are frequently a part of this; there is also significant movement around office productivity suites.
Awareness that like-for-like not being the only option is growing
The pause in proceedings has allowed an awareness among companies that like-for-like is not the only option. They have had the opportunity to consider alternatives to the traditional Windows/MS Office based fat client desktop. Although many companies are likely to continue with like-for-like, it is no longer a given.
IT needs to factor in more alternatives around devices, including from the consumer market
While IT hopes for a more locked-down world, the reality is that they expect a growing number of users to increasingly bring their own devices into the workplace. Furthermore, as a result of changing expectations, most say that users now have an influence over desktop modernisation plans. This highlights a need to address the ‘consumerisation’ of IT more proactively.
A broader approach to upgrade is potentially more beneficial
A broader approach to refresh, including hardware, OS and office productivity tools, reduces migration overheads, leads to a more up-to-date desktop, and drives a number of benefits around user satisfaction and productivity, as well as reducing the need for IT support and power savings.
Upgrade should be used to deal with existing shortfalls
The upgrade process provides an ideal opportunity to deal with existing shortfalls, particularly around management capabilities and processes, which are often not front-of-mind for many companies, and tend to continually get pushed to the bottom of the list in terms of priorities.
This report is free of charge. Click above to download the PDF or view the interactive e-document.
If you experience any problems during this process please contact us at;
email@example.com or call +44 (0)1425 626501 / 620008
By Tony Lock
A recent global survey of 1279 IT and business professionals highlighted that rapidly changing business and regulatory demands are driving a need to modify how security is managed in their software development processes. ...more
By Dale Vile
In the drive towards ever faster and more granular software delivery cycles, it’s important to ensure that speed and responsiveness don’t come at the expense of quality. Insights from 327 IT professionals in a recent survey shed light on the issues and practicalities. ...more
By Richard Edwards
By Dale Vile
By Bryan Betts and Dale Vile
Yesterdays software delivery processes are not up to dealing with today’s demands, but modernising you approach is not just about implementing Agile, even creating a DevOps culture. You need to focus on some specific, hard-core principles. ...more
By Dale Vile & Jack Vile
Cloud services are increasingly becoming part of the IT delivery mix, but a recent study of 378 senior IT professionals suggests a parallel commitment to ongoing investment in the datacentre. This in turn shines a light on the key role of modern application platforms. ...more