Published/updated: April 2010
by Jon Collins and Martin Atherton
Introducing application retirement: what’s really important to you?
Whatever can be said about IT in today’s organisations, our research shows us that we must start from the premise that ‘it’s not wrong’. Plentiful reasons exist why infrastructure and applications are as they are: some of them historical, because it made sense at the time, or organisational in terms of who had the budget, or indeed because yesterday’s innovations can so quickly become today’s legacy.
This is particularly relevant in how applications, and the repositories upon which they depend, deliver services to business users. A senior business manager once said to us:
“What’s wrong with silos? At least they work. I would rather have off the shelf proprietary systems and employ four or five extra people, than spend millions on a system, and the day after its implemented, somebody comes along saying, “Can it do this?” and you end up with 3 or 4 programmers continually working on the system and modifying it.”
Against this background it is unlikely we will ever arrive at what could be considered as ‘application nirvana’ – that is, the perfect software layer which supports the business’ every requirement without ever needing to be changed. As organisations evolve and new capabilities emerge, from online banking to mobile access, so do the software and hardware platforms upon which they depend. And in turn, these impose new challenges on the data.
The downside is that IT has to deal with the consequences of constant change. We talk about such challenges as fragmentation, inefficient operations, data security and so on, which often result from where IT systems have not kept up with the changing requirements of the business. Change events can be difficult to pre-empt or indeed predict – one strategic business acquisition or change in market dynamics, such as a merger or indeed (as we have seen most recently) the credit crunch, can result in even recently deployed applications becoming more of a burden than a help.
The insights upon which this paper is based are taken from a number of research projects designed, executed and interpreted independently by Freeform Dynamics. This paper has been authored independently by Freeform Dynamics and is sponsored by IBM.
This report is free of charge. Click above to download the PDF or view the interactive e-document.
If you experience any problems during this process please contact us at;
email@example.com or call +44 (0)1425 626501 / 620008
By Tony Lock
A recent global survey of 1279 IT and business professionals highlighted that rapidly changing business and regulatory demands are driving a need to modify how security is managed in their software development processes. ...more
By Dale Vile
In the drive towards ever faster and more granular software delivery cycles, it’s important to ensure that speed and responsiveness don’t come at the expense of quality. Insights from 327 IT professionals in a recent survey shed light on the issues and practicalities. ...more
By Richard Edwards
By Dale Vile
By Bryan Betts and Dale Vile
Yesterdays software delivery processes are not up to dealing with today’s demands, but modernising you approach is not just about implementing Agile, even creating a DevOps culture. You need to focus on some specific, hard-core principles. ...more
By Dale Vile & Jack Vile
Cloud services are increasingly becoming part of the IT delivery mix, but a recent study of 378 senior IT professionals suggests a parallel commitment to ongoing investment in the datacentre. This in turn shines a light on the key role of modern application platforms. ...more